U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Woodlin v. Hon Company

Woodlin v. Hon Company
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 28, 2003

Woodlin v. Hon Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1560

DANIEL P. WOODLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE HON COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.

THOMAS H. ROBERTS, Esq., Movant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-02-186-3)

Submitted: July 2, 2003 Decided: July 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel P. Woodlin, Appellant Pro Se. Lynn Forgrieve Jacob, Dana C.M. Peluso, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CLARK & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Daniel P. Woodlin has filed a second notice of appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer in his action alleging employment discrimination. We previously affirmed the district court’s order in Woodlin’s first appeal of that order. See Woodlin v. Hon Co., No. 03-1161, 2003 WL 21154294 (4th Cir. May 20, 2003) (unpublished). Our affirmance of the order is now the law of the case, see Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 815-16 (1988); Sejman v. Warner-Lambert Co., 845 F.2d 66, 68-69 (4th Cir. 1988), and thus we dismiss the instant appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.