Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2426
MARTHA K. BALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-01-359-3-T)
Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 28, 2003
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Rizk, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy L. Cox Gruendel, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Martha K. Ball appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ball v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. CA-01- 359-3-T (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.