John Thomas Neal appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) and his motions to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Neal v. Sondervan, No. CA-01-2604t-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 25, 2002; Apr. 12, 2002; filed June 14, 2002 & entered June 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.