Taylor v. Robinson
Opinion
Roosevelt Taylor, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. Robinson, No. CA-02-510-3 (E.D.Va. Apr. 4, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Roosevelt TAYLOR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.A. ROBINSON, Warden; D.M. Vaughan, Major-Security; Rachel Dove, Food Service Director; A.C. Downs, Sargent-Security; JO Trent, Sargent-Security; H. Hite, R.N., Medical Department, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished