U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Sawyer v. Cir Ct of Fairfax

Sawyer v. Cir Ct of Fairfax
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 3, 2003

Sawyer v. Cir Ct of Fairfax

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1631

AVA MAUREEN SAWYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ARTHUR B. VIEREGG, JR., The Honorable; DAVID T. STITT, The Honorable; CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ARTHUR SINCLAIR, The Honorable; CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY; DENNIS HUPP, The Honorable; THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; CLARENCE G. WILLIAMS, JR., Sheriff; ROBERT T. WILLIAMSON, Sheriff; ESTATE OF PRESTON CONNER; DEAN S. WORCESTER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-258-A)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ava Maureen Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Robert A. Dybing, THOMPSON & MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia; John David Griffin, FOWLER, GRIFFIN, COYNE & COYNE, P.C., Winchester, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ava Maureen Sawyer appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for a preliminary injunction in her civil action attacking a Virginia circuit court judgment against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Sawyer v. Circuit Court of Fairfax County, No. CA-03-258-A (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 9, 2003; entered Apr. 17, 2003. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.