U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Lopez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft

Lopez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2003

Lopez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1089

SANTOS CRUZ LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A70-294-398)

Submitted: August 12, 2003 Decided: September 2, 2003

Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul S. Haar, Pauline M. Schwartz, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL S. HAAR, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Joan E. Smiley, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Santos Cruz Lopez-Hernandez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Lopez-Hernandez’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Lopez-Hernandez, No. A70-294-398 (B.I.A.

Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.