Mauricio Mack Gill appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gill v. Waters, No. CA-03-432-2 (E.D. Va. entered June 20, 2003; filed July 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.