Lewis v. Boucher
Lewis v. Boucher
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2466
WILBERT WESLEY LEWIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W. G. BOUCHER, personally and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Roanoke,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CITY OF ROANOKE; ATLAS GASKINS, personally and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Roanoke,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-566-7)
Submitted: July 22, 2003 Decided: September 8, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbert Wesley Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wilbert Wesley Lewis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) action, pursuant to
the jury’s verdict. Lewis has not provided a transcript, and he
fails to establish a basis to have a transcript prepared at
government expense.
28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). We have reviewed
the existing record and find no basis for appellate relief.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Lewis v.
Boucher, No. CA-00-566-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished