Oliver v. Osborne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Oliver v. Osborne

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6621

DAN OLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K. OSBORNE,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 03-6622

DAN OLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

K. OSBORNE; DOCTOR RAYNARD; DOCTOR CARBONE; WYATT, Correctional Officer; SMITH, Correctional Officer; FIREBAUGH, Correctional Officer; VANHAY, Correctional Officer; HUFFMAN, Regional Director, Marion Correctional Treatment Center; P. TRUE, Warden; PIXLEY, Assistant Warden; KEELING, Assistant Warden; CLARKE, Operational Officer; MOREHEAD, Correctional Officer; SUSSEX I STATE PRISON; FLEMING, Regional Director; DOCTOR LOVE; RONALD ANGELONE, former Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; BARBARA MASON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-43, CA-03-9)

Submitted: August 22, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dan Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Dan Oliver appeals the district court’s orders denying relief

without prejudice on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaints

pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g) (2000), and denying his motions to

amend and for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Oliver v. Osborne, Nos. CA-03-

43; CA-03-9 (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2003; Feb. 26, 2003; Mar. 27, 2003).

Oliver’s motions for general relief, for emergency relief, and for

appointment of counsel, as supplemented, are denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished