United States v. Starr
Opinion
Bobby Starr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his presentence investigation report to reflect that he recently obtained his general equivalency diploma (GED). We have re *505 viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Starr, No. CR-00-113 (S.D.W. Va. June 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bobby STARR, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished