U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Starr

United States v. Starr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 24, 2003 · Widener, Luttig, Traxler
76 F. App'x 504

United States v. Starr

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Starr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his presentence investigation report to reflect that he recently obtained his general equivalency diploma (GED). We have re *505 viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Starr, No. CR-00-113 (S.D.W. Va. June 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.