Lineberger v. York

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Lineberger v. York, 76 F. App'x 497 (4th Cir. 2003)

Lineberger v. York

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lineberger v. York, No. CA-02-210-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jeffrey Bernard LINEBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael YORK, Administrator I; John J. Hamlin, Programs Administrator II; Theodis Beck, Secretary of D.O.C.; Juanita H. Baker, Chairperson of the North Carolina Parole; Karem R. Pardue, Senior Parole Case Analyst; Mary Harrop, Parole Case Analyst; Judy H. Sills, Manager of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Unpublished