Lineberger v. York
Opinion
Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lineberger v. York, No. CA-02-210-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jeffrey Bernard LINEBERGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael YORK, Administrator I; John J. Hamlin, Programs Administrator II; Theodis Beck, Secretary of D.O.C.; Juanita H. Baker, Chairperson of the North Carolina Parole; Karem R. Pardue, Senior Parole Case Analyst; Mary Harrop, Parole Case Analyst; Judy H. Sills, Manager of the North Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Unpublished