U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Lineberger v. York

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 24, 2003 · Williams, King, Gregory

76 F. App'x 497

Counsel

Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger, Appellant pro se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Office of the Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lineberger v. North Carolina Department of Correction (N.C. Ct. App. 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Bernard Lineberger appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lineberger v. York, No. CA-02-210-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.