Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
Opinion
Mable Smith and Sheatrina Smith appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendants in their product liability action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. The Sherwin-Williams Co., No. CA-02-623-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Mable SMITH; Sheatrina Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY; Dolgencorp, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees, and Crown Cork & Seal Company, Incorporated, Party in Interest, the Estate of Thomas J. Harlan, Jr., Party in Interest
- Status
- Unpublished