U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 10, 2003 · Widener, Niemeyer, Williams
77 F. App'x 664

Smith v. Sherwin-Williams Co.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mable Smith and Sheatrina Smith appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendants in their product liability action. We have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. The Sherwin-Williams Co., No. CA-02-623-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.