Windsor v. Compton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Windsor v. Compton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6834

ANDREW WINDSOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

B. G. COMPTON, Warden, USP Lee,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7)

Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Andrew Windsor, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Compton v. Windsor, Nos. CR-90-228, CA-03-251-7 (W.D.

Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished