Charif v. Federal Bureau Pris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charif v. Federal Bureau Pris

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6893

WADGY CHARIF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP); FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-PETERSBURG; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; JOSEPH BROOKS; C. MENDOZA; J. ALLEN; S. SHAH; E. PANAGUITON; J. FAJARDO; E. SORIO; CATHY MCCULLAN; YOLANDA VASQUEZ; MR. BRODIE; TERRY D. WRIGHT; MR. PRICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-265-AM)

Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wadgy Charif, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Wadgy Charif appeals the district court’s orders dismissing

his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971), for failure to

state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Charif also

appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Charif v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,

No. CA-03-265-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7, 2003 & entered Apr. 8,

2003; filed May 12, 2003 & entered May 13, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished