Charif v. Federal Bureau Pris
Charif v. Federal Bureau Pris
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6893
WADGY CHARIF, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS (BOP); FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION-PETERSBURG; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; JOSEPH BROOKS; C. MENDOZA; J.
ALLEN; S. SHAH; E. PANAGUITON; J. FAJARDO; E.
SORIO; CATHY MCCULLAN; YOLANDA VASQUEZ; MR. BRODIE; TERRY D. WRIGHT; MR. PRICE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-03-265-AM)
Submitted: September 30, 2003 Decided: October 8, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wadgy Charif, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Wadgy Charif appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Charif also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Charif v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. CA-03-265-AM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 7, 2003 & entered Apr. 8, 2003; filed May 12, 2003 & entered May 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.