Mee v. Hubbard
Opinion
Clifford B. Mee appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mee v. Hubbard, No. CA-02-1750MJG (D.Md. Feb. 3, 2003; filed Mar. 25, 2003 & entered Mar. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Clifford B. MEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel HUBBARD, Officer; Clifford Van Housen; Joyce Smith; Board of Education of Anne Arundel County, a Body Corporated and Politic, Defendants-Appellees, and MSDM Incorporated, T/A Maryland Championship Wrestling Promotion, Defendant
- Status
- Unpublished