Darryl Lewis Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harris v. United States, Nos. CR-95-171; CA-99-01506-2 (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2003). We deny Harris’s motion for production of documents and his request to stay his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.