Gachoki v. Ashcroft
Gachoki v. Ashcroft
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1301
CATHERINE N. GACHOKI, Petitioner, versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A75-843-584)
Submitted: September 15, 2003 Decided: October 6, 2003
Before WILKINSON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, RONALD D. RICHEY & ASSOCIATES, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Senior Litigation Counsel, Timothy P. McIlmail, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Catherine N. Gachoki, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s decision and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Gachoki, No. A75-843-584 (B.I.A. Feb. 13, 2003); see also 8 C.F.R. §§ 1208.13(b)(3), 1208.16(b)(1)(i)(B), (c)(3)(ii) (2003) (providing that an alien is not eligible for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture if internal relocation is a reasonable option). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.