United States v. Chan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Chan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TOM CHAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-4057

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM CHAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-01-290)

Submitted: August 26, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina; Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders

affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan,

No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished