U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Chan

United States v. Chan
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2003

United States v. Chan

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-4056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

TOM CHAN, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-4057

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

WILLIAM CHAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-01-290)

Submitted: August 26, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina; Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellants. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan, No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.