Altizer v. City of Roanoke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Altizer v. City of Roanoke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1429

SCOTT B. ALTIZER; J. RICHARD DREWERY; SUSAN A. CAMPER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

CITY OF ROANOKE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District ov Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-484-7)

Submitted: October 3, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry N. Grimes, TERRY N. GRIMES, ESQ., P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. William M. Hackwork, Elizabeth K. Dillon, CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Scott B. Altizer, J. Richard Drewery, and Susan A. Camper

appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to

Defendant in this Title VII action alleging discriminatory failure

to promote. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Altizer v. City of Roanoke, No. CA-02-484-7

(W.D. Va. Mary 21, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished