McKinnedy v. Maynard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McKinnedy v. Maynard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7108

WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY D. MAYNARD; JIM HODGES, Governor of South Carolina; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General; KENNETH MCKELLAR, Director of Security; MR. MCKIE, General Counsel; ROBERT WARD; RICKIE HARRISON, Warden; ROBERT E. PETERSEN; BEN MONTGOMERY; MR. MIRO, Warden; DONALD DEASE; RICHARD P. STROKER; J VICENT BARTON; CRYSTAL ROCKARD; MARY DAVENPORT; DAVID TATARSKY; PATRICIA RAINEY; JAMES SIMMONS, III; TRACI BRAXELY, Grievance Branch; CALVIN ANTHONY; DAVID DUNLAP; DAVID NELSON; ROBERT MURRAY, Captain; SINGLETARY, NFN; SOLOMON SANYO; MR. ROBINSON; MR. MILLER; MR. JERNIGAN; MR. BROGDAN; MR. SEWARD; MR. WALTZ; REGGIE BOWERS; MR. FIERSON; MR. REDFERN; DAVIS HARMON; SARGEANT CUSTODIO; SARGEANT COMER; SARGEANT ROBERTSON; OFFICER MACKEY; MR. GALLAWAY; OFFICER CUTLIP; MR. BURRELL; MR. GARY; MR. CLYBURN; MR. ALLEN; MR. GOODWIN; JOHN LANE; MR. MCCOWAN; MR. NEADLE; MR. WEST; DEBRA WISE; OFFICER MITCHELL; MR. WOODLIEF; MR. FLEMING; C. A. BALKCUM; MR. MEDLOCK; MR. LONG; MR. HARDIN; MR. NELSON; MR. STEEN; MR. ROBINSON; MR. ARMSTRONG; MICHAEL R. MATHEWS; NATHANIEL HUGHES, SCDC; J. L. GOWAN, Doctor; MR. MCKINNEY; MR. COOKE; SENYA L. ADAMS; MR. PHILIPS; MR. GARDNER; MR. ANDERSON; RAY N. STEVENS; CAROLYN MATTHEWS; JUDY C. ANDERSON; JOHN ADAMS; KELLI G. MADDOX; MR. SUTTENS; OFFICER WILSON, Correctional Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-4027-6-20-AK)

Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 21, 2003

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Clayton McKinnedy, III, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, TINSLEY, BAGGETT & POSTON, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

South Carolina inmate William Clayton McKinnedy, III, seeks to

appeal the denial of several motions made during the course of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

litigation against the Defendants. This court may

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000). The order McKinnedy seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.* We

also deny Appellant’s motions for injunctive relief and for

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

* To the extent that the denial of McKinnedy’s motion for reconsideration of an earlier order denying him transfer from state to federal prison is not interlocutory, we find his claim on this issue to be without merit.

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished