U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Phelps v. Ashcroft

Phelps v. Ashcroft
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 31, 2003

Phelps v. Ashcroft

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7087

COY RAY PHELPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOHN ASHCROFT; KATHLEEN HAWK-SAWYER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-461-5-H)

Submitted: October 23, 2003 Decided: October 31, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Coy Ray Phelps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Coy Phelps appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), as frivolous. See U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Ashcroft, No. CA-03-461-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.