Pearson v. Cushwa

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Pearson v. Cushwa

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7003

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Chairperson of Parole & Probation; WILLIAM SONDERVAN, Doctor, Commissioner of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-1603-RDB)

Submitted: October 15, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order placing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint on the

inactive-unassigned docket. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2000), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order Pearson seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we deny Pearson’s motions to enter additional

information, for injunctive relief, and for appointment of counsel

and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished