Hilton-Bey v. US Patent & Trade
Hilton-Bey v. US Patent & Trade
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1765
JOHNNY HILTON-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, Disclosure Document Program,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02- 4218-AMD, CA-03-1102-AMD)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Hilton-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Johnny Hilton-Bey (“Hilton”) appeals from the dismissal of his
civil action in which he alleged patent and trademark infringement
against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district
court dismissed Hilton’s claims without prejudice for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have thoroughly reviewed the record
in this matter and conclude that we are without appellate
jurisdiction for the same reasons stated by the district court.
See
28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1)(2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished