Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Segundo M. Guallpa petitions for review an order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service reinstating a prior removal order. Insofar as Guallpa challenges the underlying removal order, we have no jurisdiction. See Padilla v. Ashcroft, 334 F.3d 921, 924 (9th Cir. 2003); Avila-Macias v. Ashcroft, 328 F.3d 108, 115 (3d Cir. 2003); see also Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 429 (4th Cir. 2002). Furthermore, we find Guallpa was not prejudiced by the procedures leading to the order reinstating the removal order.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court, and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED