Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department, 81 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2003)

Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Department

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding-precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Richard E. Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and rec *447 ommendation of the magistrate judge and awarding summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing his complaint filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Foster v. City of Greenville Fire Dep’t, No. CA-01-4824-625AK (D.S.C. Aug. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Richard E. FOSTER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CITY OF GREENVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, Defendant—Appellee, and W.T. McDowell, Chief, Fire Marshal; L.H. Godfrey, Assistant Fire Marshal; R.A. Cook; Kenny v. Crosby, Director of Human Resources, Defendants
Status
Unpublished