United States v. Grayson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Grayson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7048

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD CLAUDIUS GRAYSON, a/k/a Doobie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-530, CA-02-1926)

Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 18, 2003

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Claudius Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Reginald Claudius Grayson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his request for a certificate of appealability under

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(2000). Grayson previously appealed the district

court’s denial of his motion for relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), and in that appeal we concluded that no certificate of

appealability was warranted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished