United States v. Grayson
United States v. Grayson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7048
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
REGINALD CLAUDIUS GRAYSON, a/k/a Doobie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-530, CA-02-1926)
Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 18, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Claudius Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Reginald Claudius Grayson seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his request for a certificate of appealability under
28 U.S.C. § 2253(2000). Grayson previously appealed the district
court’s denial of his motion for relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(2000), and in that appeal we concluded that no certificate of
appealability was warranted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished