Bernard Gibson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2003). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Gibson, No. CR-94-454-PJM (D. Md. filed July 1, 2003; entered July 4, 2003). We deny as unnecessary Gibson’s motion for general relief, in which he sought a certificate of appealability, because Gibson’s appeal is not from “the final order in a proceeding under [28 U.S.C.] section 2255.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED