Stevens v. Garraghty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 25, 2003

Stevens v. Garraghty, 81 F. App'x 779 (4th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bertram Stevens appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Stevens v. Garraghty, No. CA-01-859-3 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: Bertram STEVENS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. D.A. GARRAGHTY, Warden; Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Respondents—Appellees
Status: Unpublished