U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Stevens v. Garraghty

Stevens v. Garraghty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 25, 2003 · Widener, Michael, Traxler
81 F. App'x 779

Stevens v. Garraghty

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bertram Stevens appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Stevens v. Garraghty, No. CA-01-859-3 (E.D.Va. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.