Moore v. Guidice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit November 25, 2003

Moore v. Guidice, 81 F. App'x 782 (4th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this cross-appeal, William J. Guidiee appeals from the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for a new trial after a jury awarded $200,000 in compensatory damages to Plaintiff Reginald O. Moore on his defamation claim. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. Guidice, No. CA-01-1886-A (E.D.Va. filed Dec. 13, 2002 & entered Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

Reference

Full Case Name: Reginald O. MOORE, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. William J. GUIDICE, Defendant—Appellant, and United International Investigative Services, Incorporated, Defendant
Status: Unpublished