Harrell v. Currie
Harrell v. Currie
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7527
THOMAS JAMES HARRELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGE E. CURRIE; JAMES CHAPELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARRIS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VINSON; SERGEANT MCRAE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-597-5)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 5, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas James Harrell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Thomas James Harrell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Currie, No. CA-03-
597-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished