U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Harrell v. Currie

Harrell v. Currie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 5, 2003

Harrell v. Currie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7527

THOMAS JAMES HARRELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

GEORGE E. CURRIE; JAMES CHAPELL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARRIS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VINSON; SERGEANT MCRAE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-03-597-5)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 5, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas James Harrell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Thomas James Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Currie, No. CA-03- 597-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.