Boney v. Clarke

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Boney v. Clarke, 82 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2003)

Boney v. Clarke

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Torino Boney appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boney v. Clarke, No. CA-03-279 *309 (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2003). We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Torino BONEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. David CLARKE; Eddie Pearson; B. Quinn; Ms. Rogers; D. Ormond; E. Alston; Birdsong; Darlene Coles, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Unpublished