Boney v. Clarke
Opinion
Torino Boney appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Boney v. Clarke, No. CA-03-279 *309 (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2003). We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Torino BONEY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. David CLARKE; Eddie Pearson; B. Quinn; Ms. Rogers; D. Ormond; E. Alston; Birdsong; Darlene Coles, Defendants—Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished