Ross v. State of SC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ross v. State of SC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7263

NORRIS ROSS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLESTON COUNTY; CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 03-7277

NORRIS ROSS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA, State; CHARLESTON COUNTY; CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-03-2169-2, CA-03-2205-2-18AJ) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norris Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Norris Ross, a South Carolina

pre-trial detainee, appeals from the district court’s orders

accepting the reports and recommendations of a magistrate judge and

dismissing without prejudice his

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000) petitions

for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district

court’s opinions discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ross v. South

Carolina, Nos. CA-03-2169-2; CA-03-2205-2-18AJ (D.S.C. filed Aug.

6, 2003 & entered Aug. 7, 2003; Aug. 13, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished