Jones v. Kavanaugh
Jones v. Kavanaugh
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7283
CHARLES JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JACK KAVANAUGH; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; DOCTOR TESFAYE, Director; JOHN MOSS, Physician Assistant; OFFICER HILTON; EDWARD TAMES, Lieutenant; CHRISTOPHER OZOUKWU, Officer; THOMAS RESHKE, Nurse; PATRICE DEWITT, Pharmacy Nurse; OFFICER ROBINSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-3409-RDB)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Kavanaugh,
No. CA-02-3409-RDB (D. Md. filed July 22, 2003; entered July 23,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished