Bailey v. Anne Arundel County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bailey v. Anne Arundel County

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1458

DENNIS BAILEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4044-H)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Dennis Bailey appeals the district court’s order granting Anne

Arundel County’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief on

his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-01-4044-

H (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished