Bailey v. Anne Arundel County
Bailey v. Anne Arundel County
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1458
DENNIS BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4044-H)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans, Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Dennis Bailey appeals the district court’s order granting Anne Arundel County’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-01-4044- H (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.