Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor
Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7445
CHARLES WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONERS; SERGEANT MCDONALD; CO II SELLMAN; CO II SOFELLO; CO IV PAINTER; JAMES PEGUESE, Each Defendant is hereby sued individually and severally,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SECURITY OFFICER STITCH,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-412-RDB)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 8, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Maryland
Dep’t of Corr. Comm’rs, No. CA-03-412-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished