U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor

Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 8, 2003

Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7445

CHARLES WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONERS; SERGEANT MCDONALD; CO II SELLMAN; CO II SOFELLO; CO IV PAINTER; JAMES PEGUESE, Each Defendant is hereby sued individually and severally, Defendants - Appellees, and

SECURITY OFFICER STITCH, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-412-RDB)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 8, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr. Comm’rs, No. CA-03-412-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.