UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2053

DAWN FIGMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

POWERS, Police Chief; OFFICER DOWNEY; MR. ANDERSON; CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA; MARY WASHINGTON COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-2109

DAWN FIGMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

POWERS, Police Chief; OFFICER DOWNEY; MR. ANDERSON; CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA; MARY WASHINGTON COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-2207

DAWN FIGMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

POWERS, Police Chief; OFFICER DOWNEY; MR. ANDERSON; CITY OF FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA; MARY WASHINGTON COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-03-536)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 19, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dawn Figman, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Lee Parrish, ROBERTS, ASHBY & PARRISH, Fredericksburg, Virginia; James Christian Stuchell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dawn Figman appeals the district court’s orders denying her second motion for leave to amend her civil rights complaint, granting defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, and denying her motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Figman v. Powers, No. CA-03-536 (E.D. Va. July 29, 2003; Aug. 8, 2003 & Aug. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED