Crenshaw v. Whse Employees Union

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Crenshaw v. Whse Employees Union

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1884

BRUCE A. CRENSHAW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 322,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-794)

Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 16, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce A. Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Gans Axelrod, BEINS, AXELROD, KRAFT, GLEASON & GIBSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse

Employees Union, Local 322, No. CA-02-794 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished