U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Crenshaw v. Whse Employees Union

Crenshaw v. Whse Employees Union
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 16, 2003

Crenshaw v. Whse Employees Union

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1884

BRUCE A. CRENSHAW, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WAREHOUSE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 322, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-794)

Submitted: November 14, 2003 Decided: December 16, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce A. Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Gans Axelrod, BEINS, AXELROD, KRAFT, GLEASON & GIBSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322, No. CA-02-794 (E.D. Va. July 15, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.