U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

In re: D'Anjou v.

In re: D'Anjou v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 15, 2003

In re: D'Anjou v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7123

In Re: ROBERT AUGUSTINE D’ANJOU, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Audita Querela. (CR-91-86-MU)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 15, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Augustine D’Anjou, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Robert Augustine D’Anjou petitions this court for a writ of audita querela, seeking to have this court recall its mandate in United States v. D’Anjou, No. 99-7004 (4th Cir. Nov. 10, 1999) (unpublished). We note that we previously denied D’Anjou’s earlier motion to recall the mandate, and we conclude that a writ of audita querela is not an appropriate means of seeking recall of a court’s mandate. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir. 2001). We therefore grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the petition for a writ of audita querela. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.