Smith v. Dewalt
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Pete Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Dewalt, No. CA-03-709-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Pete SMITH, A/K/A Pete Noble Muhammad, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Stephen DEWALT, Warden, Respondent—Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished