Roberts v. Stridiron
Roberts v. Stridiron
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7477
ALRICK LEWIS ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IVER STRIDIRON; HORACE MAGRAS; RUSSELL L. BORAAS; S.K. YOUNG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-237-7)
Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 23, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alrick Lewis Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Alrick Lewis Roberts appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Roberts v. Stridiron, No. CA-03-237-7 (W.D. Va.
Aug. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished